The epic movie Lonesome Dove had its moments. One of the best was this little lesson on customer interaction in the food service industry…
The epic movie Lonesome Dove had its moments. One of the best was this little lesson on customer interaction in the food service industry…

Most of our life effort can be divided into two neat activities: acquiring stuff and getting rid of stuff. Sure, there are other ways to do it, but this is an approach worth considering. I know several folks who have been up and down that continuum several times (on purpose!). As I look around my little section of the world, I notice that there is a lot of stuff. It occurs to me that some of this stuff is totally useless. So here’s my top 5 list of of worthless crap I own that I really should get rid of:
What kind of useless/worthless crap is in your home?

Nope. I do not mean spending money at black-owned establishments. I’m talking about pandering in a less than forthright manner. What would your reaction be if I told you that Dominos Pizza had set up a website that specifically targeted white people for education, employment, career advancement and entrepreneurship opportunities, and to meet real people whose lives have been touched by the Dominos enterprise? You’d cry racial foul, of course. So what if McDonald’s did the same thing… Except their public relations department chose to target black people… Would you still cry foul? Ladies and gentlemen… I give you:
Somebody please figure out a way to spin this so that it becomes acceptable…

WASHINGTON—As part of his administration’s continued efforts to stimulate the economy and liven up a slow weeknight, President Obama announced today that, effective immediately, Tuesdays will be half-off for ladies nationwide. “It is imperative to our economic health that we inject capital wisely and get some blondes in here, preferably hot young ones,” said Obama, who submitted a proposal before Congress to increase tube-top usage by 200 percent. “We can only escape this recession with the full cooperation of the American people—so ladies, please, bring your girlfriends. When did this country turn into such a sausage fest?” According to estimates by the Department of the Interior, the first national Ladies’ Night will be attended by an estimated 117 million men and one bachelorette party.

Recently, I made a post about the new credit card legislation passed by the Senate. There’s been a lot of speculation as to how this bit of law will affect consumers. Here’s a great true/false piece on what to take away from the bill. Of course, I’m thoroughly amused that a piece of legislation was quietly slipped into the fine print of the bill… and it got swept into the master plan with hardly a peep. What am I prattling on about? An amendment to this bill includes a provision to allow the carrying of loaded weapons into national parks. That means that a whole bunch of Democrats will be presenting the President with legislation that expands the legal use of firearms, as opposed to contracting it.
Yep, a bill whose main purpose was to protect consumers from “the fine print” got piggybacked with some fine print of its own. This is known as legislative extortion. But lest anyone cry foul, this has been a part of the legislative status quo for ages. It would be solved by a line item veto provision for the President, but whenver the issue came down to it, no Congress could actually get behind it because it’s the only way they know of to get things accomplished when there are opposing dogmatic viewpoints (always).

The Senate recently passed the Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Act of 2009. It seems like a slam-dunk that has nothing but the consumers’ interest at heart. Nobody should be against this, right? But 5 Senators *did* vote against it: Alexander (R-TN), Bennett (R-UT), Johnson (D-SD), Kyl (R-AZ) and Thune (R-SD). Not voting on the bill at all: Byrd (D-WV), Ensign (R-NV), Kennedy (D-MA) and Rockefeller (D-WV). Why would anyone be against this? Yes, credit card company fees, rates and charges can border on usury. But what if the credit card industry decides to combat their new risk exposure with decreased lending? Think it will not happen? Look at current credit markets. Rates are down but it can be quite difficult to actually secure that credit. Credit card companies will likely follow suit. Your interest rate will go down, but so will your line of credit, or open to buy. Carrying a $5,000 balance? Expect your line of credit to get reduced each time you make a payment. Best of luck. Once again, government trying to manage something they have no skill at running will have dramatic, unintended consequences.
It’s heartening to know that black people and white people can shop without fear at the Red House furniture store in High Point, North Carolina.

We’ve all heard about those amazing lawsuits involving fast food chains. They usually involve some wild-ass claim. There’s a guy suing BK for screwing up his order in Virginia. Seems kind of silly, eh? But when you read the actual lawsuit, it would appear that the plaintiff genuinely feels like he has been damaged by BK’s mistake. I get it and am actually gratified to see that somebody actually considered how they were damaged as a basis for the lawsuit. I guess the questions are… Assuming one knew about a severe allergic reaction to a particular substance (presumably, that’s why he specifically ordered his meal without the ingrdient), wouldn’t a reasonable person actually check the item to be consumed before consuming it to avoid such reactions? Or does the sole responsibility for one’s health and welfare, or injury to that health, reside with the provider of substances that affect it? I gotta think that making BK responsible for insuring that you do not have allergic reactions is kind of silly.
If only…

It has taken a bit for my medical insurance provider to assimilate and process the claims for my recent colonoscopy. I thought I would share the results with you. At least, the results as they exist right now. I have no doubt that there will be even more fiddling and massaging of the expenses by involved parties.
But how did those costs get broken out? What did insurance cover? What did it bounce, what did it discount and what got “written off”?
So, out of the original, $5,786.98… There are at least $3,535.54 in write offs that just vanish. I’m out of pocket $1,392.36 and my insurance paid out approximately $893.22. If you are not completely confused yet, there’s more to the story. I have a limited flexible spending account that can be used to pay for out of pocket expenses not covered by insurance. Money is pulled out of each of my wife’s paychecks and deposited into the flexible spending account as pre-tax dollars. We get to use our own money to pay for these expenses, but it is pre-tax money as opposed to net money, which results in about a 25-30% savings. So my true out of pocket is really like a bit over $1,000 when all is said and done.
Is there a bright side to this? Well, yes. There was some light in there when the doctor was doing his thing. And he found out that there’s really nothing wrong with my plumbing and peace of mind does have value. Of course, a $1,000 would have made for a helluva night on the town with wifey and then some fun at a swanky hotel… Don’t just assume that your insurance is going to cover it all. Be an educated consumer!